Verdict+AngieK

Verdict

The trial of “the world and everything in it is unplanned accident, existence is meaningless; the past is irrelevant: nothing matters” was composed of two sides each representing the two polar positions. Considering only on the performance in the trial, I believe that Position Two has proved their case better than Position One. This was a difficult decision to make because the terms weren’t very clear and the statement we were arguing was very broad. Two sides were arguing two different sides, Position One from the viewpoint of the Dragon, God-like creatures who could see all things, while Position Two is from the view point of people trying to make their way in the world whatever way they can. Event though I was standing as Grendel in Position One fighting for omniscient views, I could see that we were lacking in evidence and could not response directly and specifically to what the Position Two has asked. However, Position Two has done quite well responding to our questions and picking on our mistakes. Not only were position one's arguments invalid and flawed in many places, our witnesses also failed to answer the questions properly. Although this may sound unusal I think lawyers of Position Two had logical questions and more agreeable questions. I believe that Postion Two has won the trial, however, I am not stating that they were flawless. Perhaps they could have been more clear with the answers and the questions.